Prognosis for Mitral Valve Repair Surgery in Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the development of new significant mitral regurgitation and long-term survival after mitral repair surgery in functional mitral regurgitation. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis of the recurrence of functional mitral regurgitation (ischemic and nonischemic) and global mortality during follow-up of 176 patients who underwent mitral repair surgery between 1999 and 2018 in our center was conducted. RESULTS: The etiology of functional mitral regurgitation was ischemic in 55.7% of cases. After surgery, mitral regurgitation was 0-I in 92.3% of cases. We conducted a long-term clinical follow-up of a mean 42.2 months and an echocardiographic follow-up of a mean 41.8 months. We observed mitral regurgitation of at least grade II in 52 patients (36.9%). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 78.8%, 66.7%, and 52.3%, respectively. Predictive factors for global mortality were age (hazard ratio = 1.038, p = 0.01) and a depressed preoperative ejection fraction. After a competing risk analysis, we found the only predictive factor for the recurrence of mitral regurgitation in our series to be age (sub-hazard ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.06, p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Repair surgery for functional mitral regurgitation shows age as the only independent predictor of recurrence. Age and depressed ejection fraction were predictors of mortality.

Reparación mitral transcatéter según la etiología de la insuficiencia mitral: datos de la vida real procedentes del registro español de MitraClip / Transcatheter mitral repair according to the cause of mitral regurgitation: real-life data from the Spanish MitraClip registry

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La reparación de la válvula mitral transcatéter (RVMT) con el sistema MitraClip es un tratamiento para los pacientes con insuficiencia mitral (IM) grave de alto riesgo quirúrgico. El objetivo principal fue analizar los resultados del RVMT en pacientes con IM grave, según la etiología. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico con inclusión de pacientes consecutivos. El objetivo primario fue el combinado de mortalidad por todas las causas y reingresos hospitalarios por insuficiencia cardiaca al año. Se compararon las características clínicas y del procedimiento y los eventos para cada grupo de IM. Se realizó un análisis multivariable para determinar las variables asociadas con el objetivo primario. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 558 pacientes; 364 (65,2%) tenían etiología funcional; 111 (19,9%), degenerativa, y 83 (14,9%), mixta. La media de edad fue 72,8±11,1 años y eran varones el 70,3%. Respecto al objetivo primario, hubo 95 (17%) eventos en toda la serie. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los 3 grupos en el número de eventos del objetivo primario: 11 (11,3%) en la IM degenerativa, 71 (21,3%) en la funcional y 13 (18,1%) en la mixta (p = 0,101). Los predictores independientes fueron la clase funcional (p = 0,029), la revascularización quirúrgica previa (p = 0,031), el EuroSCORE II (p = 0,003), la diabetes mellitus (p = 0,037) y la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (p = 0,015). CONCLUSIONES: Este trabajo confirma con datos de la práctica clínica la seguridad y la eficacia de la RVMT independientemente de la etiología de la IM y se documentan los principales factores asociados con el pronóstico durante el primer año de seguimiento

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) with MitraClip is a therapeutic option for high surgical risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The main objective of this study was to analyze differences in outcomes in patients with severe MR according to the cause of MR. METHODS: Observational, multicenter, and prospective study with consecutive patient inclusion. The primary endpoint was the combination of all-cause mortality and new readmissions due to heart failure after 1 year. We compared clinical and procedural characteristics and the event rate for each MR group. We performed a multivariate analysis to identify predictive variables for the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were included: 364 (65.2%) with functional etiology, 111 (19.9%) degenerative and 83 (14.9%) mixed. The mean age was 72.8±11.1 years and 70.3% of the sample were men. There were 95 (17%) events in the overall sample. No significant differences were found in the 3 groups in the number of primary outcome events: 11 (11.3%) in degenerative MR, 71 (21.3%) in functional MR, and 13 (18.1%) in mixed MR (P=.101). Independent predictors were functional class (P=.029), previous surgical revascularization (P=.031), EuroSCORE II (P=.003), diabetes mellitus (P=.037), and left ventricular ejection fraction (P=.015). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of TMVR with MitraClip irrespective of MR etiology in real-life data and shows the main factors related to prognosis during the first year of follow up

Transcatheter mitral repair according to the cause of mitral regurgitation: real-life data from the Spanish MitraClip registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) with MitraClip is a therapeutic option for high surgical risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The main objective of this study was to analyze differences in outcomes in patients with severe MR according to the cause of MR. METHODS: Observational, multicenter, and prospective study with consecutive patient inclusion. The primary endpoint was the combination of all-cause mortality and new readmissions due to heart failure after 1 year. We compared clinical and procedural characteristics and the event rate for each MR group. We performed a multivariate analysis to identify predictive variables for the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were included: 364 (65.2%) with functional etiology, 111 (19.9%) degenerative and 83 (14.9%) mixed. The mean age was 72.8±11.1 years and 70.3% of the sample were men. There were 95 (17%) events in the overall sample. No significant differences were found in the 3 groups in the number of primary outcome events: 11 (11.3%) in degenerative MR, 71 (21.3%) in functional MR, and 13 (18.1%) in mixed MR (P=.101). Independent predictors were functional class (P=.029), previous surgical revascularization (P=.031), EuroSCORE II (P=.003), diabetes mellitus (P=.037), and left ventricular ejection fraction (P=.015). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of TMVR with MitraClip irrespective of MR etiology in real-life data and shows the main factors related to prognosis during the first year of follow up.